Last verified

The comparison matrix

The catalog’s cases on the four structural features that do the most classification work, plus each case’s consensus tier. Cell values summarize the classifications argued, with sources, on each case’s own page; follow the row links for the full treatment. Where the literature genuinely disputes a cell, the cell says so; a matrix that resolved disputes silently would be the exact failure this site exists to avoid.claim type: inference

CaseMass movement predating powerPalingenetic programParty paramilitarismMobilization in powerTier
Italy, 1922-43YesYesYesHighA
Germany, 1933-45YesYesYesTotalA
Ustaše CroatiaYes (exile terrorism)YesYesPartial, wartimeA
Slovak StateYesContestedYes (Hlinka Guard)ModerateA
Arrow Cross Hungary, 1944-45YesYesYesTerror, monthsA
Iron Guard Romania, 1940-41YesYesYesChaotic, monthsA
Salò RepublicYes (residual)YesYesCoercedA
Franco’s SpainNo (merged, subordinated)ContestedSubordinatedLow, demobilizingB
Imperial JapanNoContestedNo (state military)Total, from aboveB
Vichy FranceNoNoLate (Milice)DemobilizingB
Austria’s StändestaatNo (front, not movement)ContestedYes (Heimwehr)LowB
Metaxas’s GreeceNoRhetoricalNoLowB
Antonescu’s RomaniaDestroyed its movementNoNoLowB
Perón’s ArgentinaLabor movementNoNoHigh, redistributiveB
Salazar’s PortugalSuppressed its movementNoNoDemobilizingC
Horthy’s HungarySuppressed its movementNoNoLowC
Pinochet’s ChileNoNoNoDemobilizing by terrorC

Reading the matrix column by column is the exercise: the Tier A rows light up the first four columns together; the B rows split them; the C rows go dark on all four while their repression, not shown in this table, ran high. That last omission is deliberate and is the table’s lesson: repression is not a column here because repression does not discriminate between the tiers. The features that do are the ones shown.